The Campus Credit Card Trap: A Survey of College Students and Credit Card Marketing
03/27/2008
Executive Summary
Credit card lending is enormously profitable. According to
annual Federal Reserve Board of Governors’ (FRB) Reports to Congress, it is the
most profitable form of banking. But the credit card industry is saturated. The
average adult had nearly five credit cards in 2006 and the average household
received 5.7 credit card solicitations monthly in 2004, according to the 2007
FRB report.
Banks seeking even greater profits from credit cards have
several options: First, as has
been widely reported and is the subject of Congressional inquiries, banks can
squeeze their existing customers for greater profits in several ways: including (1)
using a variety of rewards and tricks such as encouraging extremely low
minimum payments to maintain highly-profitable high revolving card balances;
(2) raising interest rates on those balances through a variety of traps
including imposition of penalty interest rates for late payments and changing
due dates to encourage more of those late payments; (3) using misleading teaser rates and, (4)
raising the rates of otherwise good customers by claiming that their credit
score had declined or that they were late to another lender (called “universal
default”); Second,
banks can market to customers of other credit card companies, urging them to
switch by offering low teaser rates on balance transfers and other incentives.
But this marketing is expensive both because of the cost of the zero-interest
offers and the cost of sending out the billions of solicitations; Finally,
banks can seek out customers who have never had a card. College students are
among the most prominent targets for this marketing. They are young and understand that they need
credit to get ahead in the world. Some need credit because of the rising cost
of a college education. Finally, most of them are clumped together on campuses
that they either commute to or live at. This makes them easy to target.
Companies use a variety of techniques, from buying lists from schools and
entering into exclusive marketing arrangements with schools to marketing
directly to students through the mail, over the phone, on bulletin boards and
through aggressive on-campus and “near-campus” tabling-- facilitated by “free
gifts.”
|
Read our news release.
Download the full report.
|